Stocks CardDashboard →

Persist

Does the leadership hold?

Updated June 3, 2026

What it actually measures. Every week, all ~500 stocks are ranked against each other and sorted into ten buckets. This metric asks: over the last year, how much of the time did this stock stay in its most-common bucket? A high score means it kept its place in the line. A low score means it rotated through many buckets — chop.

How to read it

If you see…It means…
High Persist + High PerformA durable leader. The cleanest single read on the card. (Note: because everyone can see it, forward returns are only average — the durability is real, the bargain is not.)
High Persist + Low PerformDurably weak. Stuck at the back of the pack on purpose. Rarely worth buying without a specific thesis for why that changes.
High Persist + Middle PerformOften a utility or staple whose weekly returns barely move — the stability is low drama, not genuine leadership.
Low PersistEither a recent breakout that hasn't earned its position yet, or directionless chop. Check the shorter-window reads to tell which.

Using it in an IRA

The card tells you about the stock. Your account tells you how much to own.

The fine print — formula, evidence, and where it fails

rankPersistence52W = the share of the last 52 weeks the stock spent in its modal decile of the universe's weekly excess-return-vs-SPY ranking, then percentile-ranked across the universe. Modal (most-common) decile, not mean, so a leader that took a few large hits still reads as a leader.

Stability. 45% stay-rate in the same decile month-to-month, 66% within ±1. Slightly less stable than Perform, because the trailing window itself slides.

Independence. The most orthogonal tile on the card by a wide margin — average absolute correlation with the others is +0.01, essentially zero. It also has the most positive marginal information contribution (+0.004): it carries something the other three genuinely don't.

Tier-1 evidence

A single tile's job is to describe a stable, distinct dimension of stock character — not to produce alpha on its own. We test that with three questions: does the metric stay where it puts a stock month-over-month (stability), is it independent of the other tiles on the card (orthogonality), and does it carry information the others don't (marginal contribution).

Stay in same decile
45%
66% stay within ±1 decile · 86% within ±2
Avg |correlation| (other tiles)
+0.01
Max +0.03 with Perform · window: 19y
Marginal IC contribution
+0.004
IC without +0.003 → with +0.007

Correlation with the other panel headlines

Perform
+0.03
Profit
-0.01
Peril
-0.00

Diagnostics regenerated 2026-06-01

The decile evidence. The cleanest gradient of the four: a near-monotonic climb from ≈ −0.07pp/month at D1 to ≈ +0.60pp/month at D10 across ~397 anchors. The best sort key on the card — though still a screen, not a strategy; no single decile produces a tradeable Sharpe alone.

Evidence — decile screening

Mean forward excess return vs SPY for each decile of the metric, averaged across 397 monthly anchors from 1996-01-05 to 2026-05-15. Cohort: S&P 500 (point-in-time membership via fmp PIT view).

mean fwd excess (pp/period)
value
support
D10
+0.60 pp
n=396
D9
+0.28 pp
n=389
D8
+0.28 pp
n=342
D7
+0.01 pp
n=265
D6
+0.06 pp
n=161
D5
+0.45 pp
n=104
D4
+0.06 pp
n=311
D3
+0.56 pp
n=50
D2
+0.16 pp
n=393
D1
-0.07 pp
n=396

Failure modes

  • Cleanest decile gradient among the four Tier-1 tiles — the decile mean climbs almost monotonically from roughly -0.07 pp/month at D1 to +0.60 pp/month at D10. Persistence as a sorter beats persistence as a buy-signal: the cross-section ranks meaningfully, even though no decile produces a tradeable Sharpe on its own.
  • Tier-blind by construction — the metric scores a name persistently in the bottom decile exactly as high as a name persistently in the top. Splitting by direction-of-mode under PIT, the winner-tilted half earns +4.2% CAGR excess and the loser-tilted half earns +4.6% — virtually identical. The metric is genuinely about position stability, not direction.
  • Sparse middle deciles — the persistence score concentrates at fractional values (k/52 weeks at the mode), so cross-sectional deciles are unevenly populated. Deciles 3-6 typically have a quarter to a third the support of the tails (see the n column above). The monotone gradient survives this, but per-decile precision varies.
  • Slow signal — a 52-week window is by definition slow to respond. Stocks that just broke into the top decile score low on persistence even when the recent momentum is strong. The supporting 13W / 26W tiles provide faster reads of the same structural-position question.
  • PIT-correct but not fully survivorship-free — the input excess-return panel doesn't carry names that left the S&P 500 before the panel was built (Lehman, Bear, WaMu, Sears). The PIT filter removes the late-additions lift; it doesn't add back the dropped losers. True ex-ante decile means would be marginally lower than what shows above.

Signal = share of last 52 weeks the ticker spent in its modal decile of weekly excess-return rank vs SPY. Forward = next 4-week cumulative excess return. Top-decile basket = top 20 by persistence score, equal-weighted; stats are computed on the resulting per-anchor excess-return series (so Sharpe = Information Ratio and CAGR = annualized excess vs SPY).

Evidence regenerated 2026-06-01